The Cracker Daddy was pulling for Tom Barret in Wisconsin. While Kathleen Falk is a really good candidate and has big love from organized labor, Barret is the strongest candidate going against the vile Scott Walker in the recall election next month. Barret only lost to Walker by 5 points in the wave election year of 2010. There will be no enthusiasm gap on the democratic side this year. In his time in office, Scott Walker has shown himself to be a typical, new-school republican dick. Walker is a Koch Brothers' bitch -- pure and simple. The sooner he is gone, the better for everyone.
Amendment 1, the anti-gay marriage amendment, was overwhelmingly passed and is now part of North Carolina's constitution -- really North Carolina.......I mean REALLY??? Actually, there is no need to be shocked or surprised at this outcome. Going into the election it was polling at 57 - 42 in favor of the amendment. It won last night by a 61 - 39 margin. Damn -- that's a lot of bigotry voting. The funny/sad/tragic thing about this amendment passing is that gay marriage was already illegal in North Carolina. So, it's not like the gays were marrying away and threatening/destroying all of those heterosexual marriages in North Carolina -- nope....not at all. This amendment, now codified into the North Carolina constitution, bans any sort of extramarital relationship status. According to the ACLU of North Carolina, some of the pitfalls that could arise from the very vague wording of this amendment include:
- Domestic violence laws protecting people in an unmarried partnerships might be weakened. (This claim has been debated by both sides, and it's still unclear exactly how the law would impact domestic violence victims. Opponents of Amendment 1 say many of North Carolina's domestic violence laws offer special protections to victims who have an established relationship with their abusers. So if the amendment narrows the law to legally recognize only marriages, it might weaken these protective laws for unmarried partners. Supporters of Amendment 1, such as Rockingham County District Attorney Phil Berger Jr., contest this claim. Berger said nothing in the amendment changes any laws on assault, rape, murder, or other crimes.)
- Unmarried parents could no longer have the same child custody and visitation rights as married parents.
- Private agreements between unmarried couples might not longer have a legal basis. This means, for example, that if a couple who has cohabited and raised children together for years decides to separate, the wealthier partner would not be legally obligated to divide property with his or her partner.
- The law could interfere with unmarried partners' end-of-life arrangements, such as wills, trusts, and medical powers of attorney.
- Employers would no longer have to provide benefits, such as health insurance, to the partners of unmarried employees.
Last night, six-term US senator Richard Lugar was trounced by tea-partier Richard Mourdock in the Indiana republican senatorial primary. Lugar is the last of a now-extinct breed -- the reasonable republican. The full-on rush to the extreme right by the republican party is pretty much complete. All one had to do to see this in progress was to watch the freak-show that was the republican presidential primary. The republicans in Indiana have now kicked to the curb an expert in foreign policy -- a man acknowledged by all to be an expert in nuclear non-proliferation. The apostasy that sealed his doom was voting for Elena Kagen and Sonia Sotomayor for confirmation as Supreme Court justices. While the Indiana senate seat that was held by Lugar is now in play with Mourdock's win, the passing of Lugar and what it means for the republican party is lamentable. Even as a staunch progressive, The Cracker Daddy recognizes the need for an opposition party that is vibrant and engaged as a foil to our own excesses. The current incarnation of the republican party is a sick joke. It is a party populated by mean, dimwitted, bigoted, fact-denying old white people. Richard Mourdock is the epitome of the new republican party. Check out this snippet of an interview with Chuck Todd:
CHUCK TODD: You have said that there needs to be more partisanship in Washington. How do you square that with being a legislator? RICHARD MOURDOCK: Well, what I've said is that I certainly think bipartisanship ought to consist of Democrats coming to the Republican point of view. [...] Bipartisanship means they have to come our way [...] To me, the highlight of politics, frankly, is to inflict my opinion on someone else with a microphone or in front of a camera. [...] Even those Republicans who more often than not vote the right way aren't coming back into their states or their districts and getting in front of the unfriendly crowds and unfriendly microphones to make the point as to why our point of view is good. [...] I feel I can defend the purpose of conservatism, and more Republicans should be doing it just as I want to.Let's face it -- Mourdock is a dick....and he makes no apologies for being a dick. When people tell you who they are, believe them.